NFS file server performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Art Edwards edwards at icantbelieveimdoingthis.comMon Mar 26 10:02:09 PST 2001
- Previous message: NFS file server performance
- Next message: NFS file server performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm new to Beowulf. I have just gotten a small athalon cluster running under Scyld and I was interested in your comments about file transfer. I am under the impression that an MPI data transfer does not use NFS. Is this true? Also, Given the bus speed of normal motherboards, does increasing the network speed have a large impact on global performance? Art Edwards On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:38:02AM -0500, Josip Loncaric wrote: > Linux NFS is a bottleneck in itself, even with Gigabit Ethernet. You > can speed up the network, but the current Linux NFS implementation has > limitations which make it five times slower than other forms of file > transfer. Straight rcp or ftp via Gigabit Ethernet typically reaches > about 25-30 MB/s, while NFS using the same hardware delivers only about > 5-6 MB/s. > > Sincerely, > Josip > > -- > Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow mailto:josip at icase.edu > ICASE, Mail Stop 132C PGP key at http://www.icase.edu./~josip/ > NASA Langley Research Center mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov > Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA Tel. +1 757 864-2192 Fax +1 757 864-6134 > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: NFS file server performance
- Next message: NFS file server performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
