NFS file server performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Christian Storm chr at kisac.cgr.ki.seTue Mar 20 12:32:34 PST 2001
- Previous message: Ok so I ditched the LNE100TX
- Next message: how to let salve machine share the front-end machine's load
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I just took over a Beowulf cluster and I'm having having a great time reconfiguring everything ... :) It is partly used on large databases (up to 20 GB). Local storage is not possible therefore the databases reside on a disk of a dedicated file server that is mounted on all nodes of the cluster. Here are the questions: 1. To improve performance two additional networks card were put into the file server. Then the cluster was splitted in three networks (all sitting on the same switch). Each subnetwork is mounting the file throw a different NIC. These *seems* to work. But it is rather static and it is not very elegant ... . I experienced with the new 2.4 bridiging feature (by assigning all 3 NICs to a bridge), but it just seems to add redundancy, not performance. I assume some kind of channel bonding would be needed - as far as I know supported by the network-cards (3c980) but not by the driver (3c90x). Anybody knows a solution ? 2. What would be good number of NFS Daemons to run on the file-server ? (accessed by 12 nodes through 3 NICs, PIII500 system with SCSI) Currently I'm running 16 with socket input queue resized to 1MB. Thanks in advance Christian
- Previous message: Ok so I ditched the LNE100TX
- Next message: how to let salve machine share the front-end machine's load
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
