Memory Issues: /proc/kcore vs. free
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Felix Rauch rauch at inf.ethz.chThu Mar 22 08:12:29 PST 2001
- Previous message: Memory Issues: /proc/kcore vs. free
- Next message: Installing Scyld on the Master ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Gary Stiehr wrote: [...] > Supposedly the bios on these boards did not properly pass some > information to the linux kernel about the amount of memory. It was > suggested that we boot with > > linux mem=128MB > > at the lilo prompt or add > > append="mem=128M" > > to /etc/lilo.conf in the "image" sections. > > Unfortunately, this did not work for us but we feel that there may have > been other complications keeping this suggestion from working for us. There were times when it was suggested to put a little less memory in the "mem=..." option than what the machines actually had. In this example, it might help to use append="mem=127M" but I don't know if this is still true with recent kernels. - Felix -- Felix Rauch | Email: rauch at inf.ethz.ch Institute for Computer Systems | Homepage: http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/~rauch/ ETH Zentrum / RZ H18 | Phone: ++41 1 632 7489 CH - 8092 Zuerich / Switzerland | Fax: ++41 1 632 1307
- Previous message: Memory Issues: /proc/kcore vs. free
- Next message: Installing Scyld on the Master ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
