Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jakob Østergaard jakob at unthought.netMon Mar 19 11:21:06 PST 2001
- Previous message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Next message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:07:43AM -0600, Leonardo Magallon wrote: > Hi all, > ... > > When we start our job here, the switch passes no more than 31mb/s at any moment. What do you get from a standard local Bonnie benchmark, or a dd if=hugefile of=/dev/null ? Before guessing whether the low performance is due to the network or the disks, you should try to benchmark what your disks can actually deliver... Do a netperf on the network as well, so you know what you can actually push thru your gig-e. > > A colleague of mine is saying that the problem is at the network level and I am > thinking that it is at the Array level because the lights on the array just keep > steadily on and the switch is not even at 25% utilization and attaching a > console to the array is mainly for setting up drives and not for monitoring. I would suspect the array too. But I'm interested in hearing what your testing shows :) -- ................................................................ : jakob at unthought.net : And I see the elder races, : :.........................: putrid forms of man : : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, : : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. : :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
- Previous message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Next message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
