AMD annoyed...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
lowther at att.net lowther at att.netSat Mar 17 14:48:37 PST 2001
- Previous message: AMD annoyed...
- Next message: AMD annoyed...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Robert G. Brown" wrote: > > > Bemusedly yours, > I saw the page briefly before it came down. Would it be 'out of bounds' to give a hint for those waiting whether or not AT THIS MOMENT it is wise for them to wait longer or would they be just as well off going ahead with their projects based on currently available technologies? I'm sure if you had a glowing report, they wouldn't be upset at all if you were to say something positive based on what you know. After all, those waiting know the performance of a single processor board and just need to know in a price/performance framework whether or not they can get at least, say 190% performance gain before they should consider single board solutions? Not that anyone should take your silence as anything other than a gentlemanly agreement with AMD. Ken
- Previous message: AMD annoyed...
- Next message: AMD annoyed...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
