FW: Total Cost of Ownership and porting (was FW: Can we have a mo ment of silence (or several million dollars) . . . please?)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Schilling, Richard RSchilling at affiliatedhealth.orgTue Jun 26 10:34:19 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Power requirement for Athlon-MP diskless nodes
- Next message: FW: Total Cost of Ownership and porting (was FW: Can we have a mo ment of silence (or several million dollars) . . . please?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Lindahl [mailto:lindahl at conservativecomputer.com] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:57 PM > Even if you stay on a x86 32-bit platform, you have the "portability" > problem of > 4gig files, which sometimes makes you have to modify your > code. Even if all the system routines and the Fortran runtime use LFS > calls, you'll still have some places to hack in your C code. > > -- g Exactly. There was recently a discussion on this list about keeping a registry of Beowulf clusters, and I would include porting costs in that survey.
- Previous message: Power requirement for Athlon-MP diskless nodes
- Next message: FW: Total Cost of Ownership and porting (was FW: Can we have a mo ment of silence (or several million dollars) . . . please?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list