A small little survey
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Schilling, Richard RSchilling at affiliatedhealth.orgThu Jun 21 09:48:49 PDT 2001
- Previous message: [A small little survey]
- Next message: A small little survey
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I've worked in a variety of clustering environments, Beowulf and otherwise. Depending on what your budget is, you might look at the following platforms (in order of proven availability/reliability): Compaq Alpha systems, and IBM Sun Microsystems Intel AMD The advantage you have in working with these vendors is that the systems you get are complete hardware wise. They can easily be compared to each other in terms of performance because there is less variability in hardware quality compared to building your own from scratch (e.g. separately purchased parts). When figuring cost, don't underestimate the cost of tinkering with hardware and dealing with various vendors at the same time to purchase your equipment. What is your hardware setup (processor, motherboard, network, etc.)? We currently have a couple of clusters: One with recycled Compaq PCs (Intel) of PII/PIII vintage, another with Data General PCs (Intel) with PIII - currently being installed. Did you have any problems with the hardware or configuration? What is your evaluation of the cause and solution? Not too many problems at all. Just plug them in and they work for the most part. Biggest configuration issues have come out of configuring the software to "see" the hardware properly - normal system admin stuff. Are you pleased with the performance and reliability of your cluster? Please explain. Pleased for what we are using them for. The first cluster I mentioned above is for file storage and experimental application development. The second cluster I mentioned above is currently being installed as our main information system, but other companies who have installed the system are happy with the performance. The second cluster will support an enterprise environment with 1,200 users, and various web users just fine. Assuming you have a limited budget (that should be everyone), what recommendations would you have concerning cluster hardware? Try no budget here. My primary source for hardware currently is the supply of used workstations and networking equipment that are being replaced in my company. They're typically only a few years old at best, and work just fine. What has been your experience with the following hardware and financial tradeoffs (assuming you've had some experience with them)? Intel vs. AMD processors: Intel tends to be a little more expensive between the two. But, you should also weigh the cost of hardware and people-hour cost of purchasing AMD or Intel baseed nodes in pieces -vs- the cost of Sun's new workstations. They have a basic 64-bit workstation out now for $995 (called Sun Blade). As of this writing you can see it at http://store.sun.com/catalog/doc/BrowsePage.jhtml?cid=60357. It runs 64 bit UNIX and I'm certain it would be fine for clustering. You might also check out the Mac G4 running MkLinux. Not sure if Mac OS X will lend itself to clustering yet. SCSI vs. EIDE disks: I'm a big SCSI fan, but EIDE works fine, especially if you go with a RAID setup. I think it's more of a question if wether or not you'll have to repurchase new hard drives every time you move to a different motherboard. Use whatever your motherboard vendor plans to use in the future. It really nice to be able to move hard drives between nodes, especially when you use recycled equipment. Myrinet vs. Ethernet only vs. other network technologies: not sure. Ethernet seems to work fine. Server level hardware (such as the supermicro 370DLE motherboard) vs workstation level hardware: On the PC side, I'm not sure you'll see much difference, but others on this list would know better (especially Mr. Brown). You will see a difference in things like throughput with the other machines I mentioned (Sun, Alpha, IBM, etc . . .). Hope that helps. Richard Schilling Webmaster / Web Integration Programmer Affiliated Health Services Mount Vernon, WA http://www.affiliatedhealth.org -----Original Message----- From: Jared Hodge [mailto:jared_hodge at iat.utexas.edu] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:20 AM To: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: A small little survey Ok, I've got a bit of a problem and I need everyone's help (everyone who is running a cluster at least). We are considering buying a cluster, but we need to stick with proven hardware. We've been considering using the supermicro 370DLE motherboard with 1 GHz PIII processors (1 per board) and Myrinet 2000. Our cluster will probably consist of 16 nodes and one server. I'm wanting to get responses from people who have similar and/or very different configurations (AMD chips, ethernet only). We will be using our cluster for finite element analysis, and our current cluster consists of 8 PII 350s plus server and we are using a 32 bit 33 Mhz PCI interface with the older Myrinet (1.2 Gbps max - not really half that with 32 bit PCI). Personally I'm wanting to explore the possibility of getting AMD chips but I'm told it's not a "proven technology." I would like to get a mass of responses from people who are running clusters for scientific research and find out what technologies are proven. I'm personally not biased either way, but I just want the most performance and reliability for the money. I know that the following questions are very vague, but I need responses from people who have used the hardware and can share their experience. Feel free to add comments. Please answer any or all of the questions in a reply to me (you can reply and remove beowulf at beowulf.org as a recipient since I don't think everyone wants to hear all of the responses). I'll summarize the responses in a mailing back to the list at a later time if it is appropriate. The questions: Thanks for your help. -- Jared Hodge Institute for Advanced Technology The University of Texas at Austin 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 400 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: 512-232-4460 Fax: 512-471-9096 Email: Jared_Hodge at iat.utexas.edu _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [A small little survey]
- Next message: A small little survey
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
