Help!!!About Channel Bonding!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
ÁõöÎ½Ü power_liuxjie at 263.netThu Jun 21 04:30:11 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Scyld with diskless
- Next message: Help!!!About Channel Bonding!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,everyone.I have construct a set of Beowulf system.But the task of channel bonding can not be solved.My system is: one frontend node used as gateway,four computing nodes.I used three intel EEPro100 NIC cards in frontend and each computing nodes ,and one extra NE2000 PCI on frontend to connect with internet.I use one Intel 460T swither(16 ports).And I want to bong every three NIC cards to archive a better performance.So I use the "ifenslave".I write the ifcfg-bond0 and ifcfg-eth0~2 scripts.And "ifconfig" can find the "bond0" device.But I find that there is a very bad performance existed(about 100B/s).And I archive 4MB/s if I use only one NIC in each machine. My IP : Frontend: in 192.168.0.254 Computing node: 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.3 192.168.0.4 Swither: 192.168.0.253 So,can someone tell me what is wrong:Can the Intel 460T support channel bonding ?Does using channel bonding mean use more than one swither? Thanks a lot. *#####************************************#####* *The Center of Atomic and Molecular Nanoscience* *Univ. of Tsinghua |Tel.:010-6277263811 * *Beijing,china,100084 |Title:Doctor * * Interest:Parallel Computing * *#####************************************#####* _____________________________________________ [×ã²»³ö»§ ÇáËÉÉÏÍø] ÉÏÍø×¨Óúţº95963£¬Óû§Ãû/ÃÜÂ룺263 ËæÉíÌýÃÀÈÝÆ÷ÌØ¼ÛÇÀ¹º http://shopping.263.net/category23.htm
- Previous message: Scyld with diskless
- Next message: Help!!!About Channel Bonding!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
