Scyld and Red Hat 7
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ken lowther at att.netWed Jan 31 15:10:57 PST 2001
- Previous message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Next message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Siegert wrote: > 2. with respect to hardware support: most of that comes with the kernel, > particularly everything that is loaded as modules (e.g., and NIC drivers). > Hence, upgrading to a 2.4 kernel probably gets you better hardware > support than upgrading to RH 7.0. > I can agree with you in that since I upgraded to RH7 I've decided to use Mandrake instead. ;-) The original questions was about baseing the next release of Scyld in RH7. It is hard to upgrade a distro that doesn't load in the first place. If upgrading the kernel is enough, then that's fine. I can think of plenty of reasons to keep the distro as simple and functional as possible. Ken
- Previous message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Next message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
