oversized ethernet and channel-bonding
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Tegner tegner at nada.kth.seSat Jan 20 03:10:22 PST 2001
- Previous message: Wired News :Linux Plus Itanium Equals Whoosh
- Next message: PVFS and Software RAID
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Have a small 9-node cluster, 100 Mbit, D-link DFE-530 TX nics and a DES-3225G switch. Had it working quite well with channel-bonding, and for my application (CFD), on a code developed in house, an substantial increase in performance was noted. But when trying a commercial code on a similar application the performance dropped substantially. Both codes use the same version of mpich (1.1.2), but in the second case the log files get flooded by messages of the type "Oversized Ethernet frame c7fce480 vs c7fce480" and "Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple buffers, entry 0x146509 length 0 status 0600!" By switching off the bonding, the performance went back to what can be expected (for the commercial code, and a slight decrease for the in house one). The system runs on kernel 2.2.17 (with the drivers supplied with the kernel), and I will update with the latest via-rhine from Scylds home page, but I think it is odd that the bonding is working with one application (while using the same version of mpich) and not the other and I'm wondering if someone else have experienced similar problems? Thanks, Jon Tegner
- Previous message: Wired News :Linux Plus Itanium Equals Whoosh
- Next message: PVFS and Software RAID
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
