[Fwd: IP: Fact Sheet on Export Controls on High Performance Computers]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kragen Sitaker kragen at pobox.comThu Jan 11 14:49:40 PST 2001
- Previous message: [Fwd: IP: Fact Sheet on Export Controls on High Performance Computers]
- Next message: [Fwd: IP: Fact Sheet on Export Controls on High Performance Computers]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joseph A. del Stalin writes: > I know this may be way off base, but I figure I might as well > throw the idea out there. (Perhaps this already exsists and I'm > simply un-aware of it) > > In light of what I just read, I'm curious if it wouldn't benefit > the open source community to form some kind of regulatory committee > to (and I shudder at the thought of what I'm about to say) control > the software being put out. I realize that open source is a wonderful > idea, but who takes the blame for the mis-use of software? > While I don't have any examples to prove the point, I think the idea > of "we just built the atom bomb, whatever people do with it is out > of our hands" is kind of bogus. A "hands off" approach to responsibility > for software produced is wrong. > My personal opinion, specifically for the open source community, is > to take responsibility for regulating itself. I realize this goes > against the "open source" concept... In light of what I just read, I'm curious if it wouldn't benefit the academic community to form some kind of regulatory committee to (and I shudder at the thought of what I'm about to say) control the research results being put out. I realize that academic freedom is a wonderful idea, but who takes the blame for the mis-use of research results? While I don't have any examples to prove the point, I think the idea of "we just discovered TNT, whatever people do with it is out of our hands" is kind of bogus. A "hands off" approach to responsibility for ideas produced is wrong. My personal opinion, specifically for the academic community, is to take responsibility for regulating itself. I realize this goes against the "academic freedom" concept... [Actually, we've seen this happen. Think of Soviet Lysenkoism and the gulags for those who criticized the state or wrote about the gulags, the medieval Church's attacks on those who disagreed with it, the multi-millennial stagnation of ancient Egyptian art, the technological stagnation and eventual extinction of Neanderthal man, the elimination of guns in Tokugawa Japan, leading eventually to Japan's desperation and involvement in World War II --- the list goes on . . .] -- <kragen at pobox.com> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/> Perilous to all of us are the devices of an art deeper than we possess ourselves. -- Gandalf the White [J.R.R. Tolkien, "The Two Towers", Bk 3, Ch. XI]
- Previous message: [Fwd: IP: Fact Sheet on Export Controls on High Performance Computers]
- Next message: [Fwd: IP: Fact Sheet on Export Controls on High Performance Computers]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
