linux vs tru64 on alpha
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Addison addy at quadrics.comThu Sep 14 05:37:03 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Weather Modelling
- Next message: linux vs tru64 on alpha
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Page colouring springs to mind. I've heard user comments that suggest a 30-50% drop off in app performance after a clean reboot run on Linux/Alpha. Tru64's Advfs filing system doesn't require fsck. Tru64 probably supports larger memory (unless you are patching a 2.2 kernel or using a 2.4) Tru64 has a thread model that you can actually debug ;-) Not sure about the status of 'Spike' on Linux Alpha, but otherwise the Compaq compilers have levelled the field somewhat. I could even suggest that TruCluster is an advantage as it offers SSI for upto 32 nodes (SC systems only). Cheers, Addy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Tegner [mailto:tegner at nada.kth.se] > Sent: 14 September 2000 09:19 > To: beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: linux vs tru64 on alpha > > > Hi all, > > What are the pros and cons of using either linux or tru64 on a cluster > of alpha equipped nodes? I realize that one reason for using linux is > the fact that it is free, but apart from that? If one can afford it, > would the cluster in some sense be "better" if loaded with tru64? > > Thanks, > > /jon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list > Beowulf at beowulf.org > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: Weather Modelling
- Next message: linux vs tru64 on alpha
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
