Beowulf & FFT
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
dek_ml at konerding.com dek_ml at konerding.comTue Jul 18 21:19:42 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Beowulf & FFT
- Next message: Beowulf & FFT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Siegert writes: >On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Walter B. Ligon III wrote: > >> > Since I'm in the process of expanding the beowulf, I'm wondering whether >> > switching to 133 MHz would improve the results (given that I can find >> > a motherboard that supports ECC - we had that discussion). >> >> Generally, if the problem is that node-to-node communication is too slow, >> upping your system bus speed isn't going to do much in the way of improving >> your parallel system performance. > >True. However, I'm not completely convinced that node-to-node communication >is the only limiting factor: The efficiency for np=2 is miserable as well. >And that should be shared-memory communication (at least in mpich-1.2.0). My experience is that MPICH and LAM give very poor performance on linux with 100BT. Why don't you try MPI/PRO? It's easy to download and install, and it works well (I went from 4X scaling on 10CPUs to 8X scaling on a communications-intensive code). Dave
- Previous message: Beowulf & FFT
- Next message: Beowulf & FFT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
