Are we there yet?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tom Moline tpmoline at ll.netTue Jul 18 13:36:13 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Beowulf & FFT
- Next message: Are we there yet?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello all, Martin Siegert mentions using "fast FFTs to integrate PDEs using spectral methods". He further delineates a classic example of MPI becoming part of the problem rather than part of the solution. I have attempted to negotiate my expectations with massive computational algorithms by simply rendering some type of standard output that soothes my "watching the pot boil". We have quite a distance to cover in understanding the algorithmic implications of the "Beowulf" effect. No one has the same HW and SW setup, and no one is handling the same sets of computational problems. (Please correct me if I am wrong.) Part of the beauty of this beast is the diversity of usage and solutions. Perhaps some of the better funded university entities on this list would consider a competition based on the same physical and logical setups with a common problem to solve. The resulting products could provide some algorithmic stability to the ongoing discussions. best to all :-) tom_moline Prototyme
- Previous message: Beowulf & FFT
- Next message: Are we there yet?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
