cluster fs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Walter B. Ligon III walt at parl.ces.clemson.eduThu Jul 13 08:59:28 PDT 2000
- Previous message: cluster fs
- Next message: cluster fs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-------- There is no such thing as "the best file system for clusters." It depends significantly on what you want to do with the file system. There have been a number of meetings aimed at identifying the "heavenly" file system that does everything for everyone, and the result of those meetings is it does not exist, and probably never will (due to highly conflicting requirements from different user communities). Without knowing what it is you are trying to do with your file system, anyone giving you such advise is blowing smoke up your ass. For you, the BEST file system may be something as simple as NFS or may be something much, much more complex. So here are a few things to consider (NOT an exaustive list): is this for permanent storage or for short to medium term temp storage? is performance the overiding concern? is availability the overiding concern? is flexibility the overiding concern? is security the overiding concern? is protection from data loss the overiding concern? is ease of implementation/management/update the overiding concern? how many nodes are you trying to support? how many users are you trying to support? is this a Beowulf, or some other kind of cluster (is the network private, are the nodes dedicated, is it used primarily for parallel computing)? are you free to select any hardware you want, or are you constrained? is cost an overiding concern? what kind of applications do you expect to be running and what kind of file access patterns will they exhibit? Quite frankly a small cluster with a small number of users that run apps that don't do alot of I/O and you want to use cheap (IDE) disks and you don't want to spend a lot of time installing and maintaining the thing might get away with using NFS just fine. "Balls to the walls" performance is probably PVFS (thought I AM biased on that). Issues of availability and protection against loss and multi-user file access and stuff probably would lean toward a number of other approaches. So, I'm sure this is NOT what you wanted to hear, but this is as close to the truth as I can give you. Hope it helps! Walt > Hello! > > Could you advice me - what is the best file system for clusters? > If this cluster is homogeneous (Linux). > > Thank you > > Alexander > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list > Beowulf at beowulf.org > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Dr. Walter B. Ligon III Associate Professor ECE Department Clemson University
- Previous message: cluster fs
- Next message: cluster fs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
