Why no rlogin to nodes?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jag agrajag at linuxpower.orgWed Dec 13 08:03:10 PST 2000
- Previous message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Next message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Daniel Ridge wrote: > > We do what RedHat does (via heritage). > > Out of the box, Scyld ships an '/etc/beowulf/fstab' that would like > to use NFS for '/home' -- but you don't even need that. > > Beyond that, the Scyld preview relied on rdate to set the clocks on the > nodes. This meant 'inetd' on the frontend. > > We've ejected that requirement from our upcoming release with the > following piece of code: Thanks for the code. Is there any way we can see the latest that Scyld has done towards their 2.0 release? Maybe something akin to Red Hat's Rawhide. I'm setting up a small cluster that isn't expected to go into production use for a while and wouldn't mind trying to get some of the newer stuff you guys are working on to work on the cluster. Jag -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20001213/6f9eaf7a/attachment.bin
- Previous message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Next message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
