Compiling Beowulf software
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray pgeoffra at cs.utk.eduFri Dec 8 11:46:41 PST 2000
- Previous message: Compiling Beowulf software
- Next message: LAM SMP performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Josip Loncaric wrote: > memory performance using usysv transport on our SMP boxes is about as > good as the hardware can deliver (1 microsecond latency, 266 Mbyte/s > peak bandwidth). MPICH shared memory performance is not as good (16 > microsecond latency, 235 Mbyte/s peak bandwidth). On the minus side, Josip, I am very surprised by the SMP performance. 1 us is very very (too) low, it's the cost a of a system call. usysv uses SYS V semaphores, and I don't think it's possible to reach this level of latency with them. The bandwidth is also surprising, I suspect a cache effect in your test. Which processor do you use ? Special memory ? The bandwidth of MPICH SMP is, on my testbed, more around 100 MB/s (using 2 memory copies). The best I was able to get with a very optimized SMP implementation is 2 us on very fast processors without any locks and 250 MB/s using a direct memory copy between processes memory spaces. Regards. Patrick Geoffray
- Previous message: Compiling Beowulf software
- Next message: LAM SMP performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
