NFS 100:1 performance loss
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Martin Siegert siegert at sfu.caFri Aug 18 15:03:10 PDT 2000
- Previous message: NFS 100:1 performance loss
- Next message: NFS 100:1 performance loss
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Josip Loncaric wrote: > Has anyone seen this NFS performance problem? > > Our Beowulf has two servers w/RAID-0 arrays which deliver 45MB/s, > connected via Gigabit Ethernet. The machines are dual PIII/500 systems > with 512MB of RAM each. We are running Red Hat 6.2 updated to kernel > 2.2.16-3 and recently we updated to nfs-utils-0.1.9.1-1. We are running > 16 kernel nfsd threads on each machine. Here is how long it takes to > copy a 28,955,860 byte file from machine 1 to machine 2: > > rcp: 1.04 seconds (27.8 MB/s, where 1MB=10^6B) > ftp: 1.12 seconds (25.8 MB/s) > NFS 1KB: 12.35 seconds ( 2.3 MB/s, using rsize=wsize=1024) > NFS 8KB: 129.42 seconds ( 0.2 MB/s, using rsize=wsize=8192) > > Clearly, there is something very wrong with NFS, particularly with 8KB > rsize/wsize (which should have improved performance!). Our system > manager tells me that reduced Linux NFS performance with 8KB rsize/wsize > is a known problem, but even at 1KB our NFS is getting less than 10% of > the rcp or ftp performance. > > Any ideas? No ideas. Sorry. But here are the numbers from our system: dual PII/400, 256MB RAM kernel-2.2.16-3 nfs-utils-0.1.9.1-1 No RAID, etc., just IDE drives, /home and /usr/local NFS exported from the master node. Contents of /etc/fstab: ... b01:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro,hard,intr,bg,rsize=8192 0 0 b01:/home /home nfs rw,hard,intr,bg,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 0 0 # cd /usr/local/src/tar-files # ls -l linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 81674240 Jun 28 15:13 linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar # time cp linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar /tmp real 0m9.799s user 0m0.040s sys 0m2.150s That's about 63.59 Mbit/s. Second test (after "gzip linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar" on master node): # ls -l linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20673033 Jun 28 15:13 linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar.gz # time cp linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar.gz /tmp real 0m2.383s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.280s That's about 66.19 Mbit/s. In the other direction: # cd /tmp # time cp linux-2.2.16bugaboo.tar.gz /home/siegert real 0m1.854s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.270s That's about 85.07 Mbit/s. This is with 100baseT and 3C905B NICs. So I doubt that it is NFS that is at fault here ... Cheers, Martin ======================================================================== Martin Siegert Academic Computing Services phone: (604) 291-4691 Simon Fraser University fax: (604) 291-4242 Burnaby, British Columbia email: siegert at sfu.ca Canada V5A 1S6 ========================================================================
- Previous message: NFS 100:1 performance loss
- Next message: NFS 100:1 performance loss
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
